Showing posts with label Mike Bloomberg. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mike Bloomberg. Show all posts

Monday, July 30, 2012

Enough With the Selective Boycotting.

Ever since the Chris Brown-Rihanna incident, I've made a personal decision to never buy his music or in any other (conscious) way support his business financially.  Because of her response to the incident, especially as a role model for young women and in particular young black women, I also don't buy anything by Rihanna and change the station when her music comes on.  I can't listen to her without thinking about men beating up women and how terrible that is.

I'm inspired that so many people are boycotting and calling out Chick Fil-A for its CEO's hatemongering toward the LGBT community.  (I want to vomit that Bloomberg actually said it's not government's job to get in the way of beliefs of a corporation.  Um, yes it is.  If a restaurant were blocking women, or patrons of a given race, or those with disabilities, it would be a major problem and the government would most certainly be involved.)

But Chris Brown and Rihanna are also businesses.  So is Charlie Sheen (spousal abuse), Sean Penn (spousal abuse), Roman Polanski (sexual abuse), Woody Allen (child abuse, I'd say), etc etc.  If you are against it in life, don't fiscally support the perpetrator of it in leisure.

I'm not going to overlook horrific behavior, especially when people are unrepentant, just because I might enjoy something that an artist produces.  Once I find out about someone of influence doing something really damaging, I just can't enjoy their work anymore anyway.

In the U.S., we vote with our wallets.  So let's all be aware of what we're paying for.  It may not be easy - I love Target but had to push myself to switch stores as much as possible when it came out (ha!) that it was funding an anti-gay organization.  Honestly, I'd rather just shop at Target and tell myself my little purchase doesn't matter in the grand scheme of things.  But integrity is just more important.

I could be better at this.  I read the expose on workers' conditions in Apple factories in China on my iPhone with only a twinge of guilt.  But this isn't a pick-your-cause thing.  Even if you're not part of the group that's being hated on - I've never been abused, I'm not gay, I'm not a factory worker, etc - it's truly all connected.  If we allow one company to discriminate based on X, what's to stop another company from discriminating based on Y?  We need to have each other's backs as a society.

Tuesday, November 30, 2010

My Issue With Cathie Black, or, Don't Say I Didn't Warn You

Well, well, well!  A situation where Bloomberg completely disregards the rules and acts like a billionaire businessman whose latest toy is a board game called Who Wants to Run New York City, can you imagine???

Yes, you can, because if you're been reading this blog or clicking on the Bloomberg tag at right, you know I am no fan of my city's current mayor (illegally serving a third term just because he felt like it).  And finally a large group of people are calling him out for his typical behavior, most recently manifested in his appointment of Cathie Black to NYC City Schools Chancellor(ess) - a publishing exec with zero education experience.

Am I saying it's impossible for her to be good at this job?  Of course not.  But when I'm hiring, relevant experience is at least as important as managerial skills.  I do think it can be innovative to bring someone in from a different industry, but there has to be a connection.  And this connection should not be "industry that is failing miserably with little hope for the future."

But my real issue with Black is the same as my issue with Bloomberg: what, other than ego, is the incentive for her to succeed?  Her kids are in private school.  She has no ties to public education.  And I'm guessing she's taking a big salary cut.  So, like Bloomberg, whose livelihood comes not from his city salary of $1 but from private holdings, this can only be a hobby to her.  What will drive her when the going gets tough and the solutions aren't as cut-and-dried as a for-profit corporation?  How can her thinking, her impulses, her modus operandi, possibly consider the good of the children first and foremost (not to mention teachers, unions, communities, government workers) when her whole career has been about the bottom line?



Friday, April 23, 2010

Wall Street: We Are All Fucked

Yesterday Obama gave a speech urging Wall Street to behave better. Right. Good luck getting people to make less money, have a harder time making the same amount of money, or any other such strategy. This is not a time for kumbaya, it's time to make some tough laws and Wall Street can deal with it.

Of course, since finance pretty much runs the show in capitalist America, it's pretty unlikely that anything significant will happen, or at least with significant support. Take New York, for instance. Every reader of this blog knows where our dear mayor gets his billions, and it ain't taxpayer money. There is zero incentive for local or even state support for finance regulation. Word is that Senator Schumer is being pretty cool about it, but definitely not Paterson.

Obama: this isn't health care where it makes sense to try to get everyone to agree. Lay it down and make the banks get it together. (For now, until they figure out the next way to defraud us.)

Sunday, December 13, 2009

The Hypocrisy Continues

Remember how much I used to hate Bloomberg? I still do! Continuing today's theme of environmental personal responsibility, check out this report from the Times:

The average New Yorker uses one-half to one-third the electricity of other Americans. Our carbon footprints are just 29 percent of people who live outside the five boroughs, and City Hall has practical plans to reduce even that amount by nearly a third over the next two decades. No wonder that this month, in a talk at the New York Academy of Science, Rohit Aggarwalat, the mayor’s chief adviser on sustainability, said the city was “the most environmentally efficient society in the United States.”

So it makes perfect sense that Mayor
Michael R. Bloomberg is going to Copenhagen on Monday and Tuesday to address the international conference on climate change: his administration is working to head off problems that will not emerge until long after he is gone. A strong case can be made that when it comes to energy and climate issues, Mr. Bloomberg is the most visionary public official in the country.

And a strong argument can also be made that on a personal level, he ranks among the worst individual polluters ever to hold public office.

Mr. Bloomberg owns a helicopter and two jets, both Falcon 900s. He flies everywhere on private jets, by far the least efficient form of transportation on or above the earth. He takes his jet to Bermuda many weekends. He has flown around the globe on it. He uses it to go to Washington. He is planning to get to Copenhagen for the climate conference by private jet, too.


Seriously, you have to see the full article.

Man, I can't stand that guy. If I ever see him in person again I don't even know what I'd do! It's not like he's have to listen to anything I said, because unlike every other single government official in our entire city and state, we don't pay him. So he doesn't work for us. Perhaps he works for the producers of the movie 2012, ensuring all that catastrophe will indeed come to pass by personally destroying the environment. Just sayin'.

But the article is actually about the moral relativism that comes with money. It's easier, the article posits, for me to sit here and point a finger because I can't afford a private jet. I don't know. I'd like to think most of my standards of social responsibility will stay in place as I become more established. Time will tell.

Tuesday, November 3, 2009

In Which the Mayoress Crashes Bloomberg's Victory Party

I wrote this the morning after Election Day in 2005. Seems appropriate to share now...

--------------------------------------------

The Other Republican Party

No matter what anyone says, it’s fun to be on the winning team. Losing with dignity is a nice idea, but a mirage – even Red Sox fans had to invent The Curse so they could feel like they accomplished something every year they were met with a certain pinstriped team. So when the candidate I’d been volunteering for in a pivotal New York City council district won on Tuesday night, it felt good to party, good to be thanked, good to be part of the team people wanted for the next two years.

I was new to all of it – campaigning, victory parties, and even the Democratic Party. Growing up in homogeneous suburbs and later attending a conservative Christian university, my party affiliation had never been a question – everyone was a Republican. My campus didn’t have a Young Democrats chapter. Come to think of it, I’m not sure my campus even had a young Democrat.

I had been holding out longer than I’d realized, so when I swung left, I swung hard. Call me a Scorpio- my loyalty is off the meter: when I pick a party, a cause, hell, a coffee shop, my allegiance is rock solid. As with most things, when you decide to associate yourself with an idea, it seeps into your skin more than you know.

My experience volunteering had been wonderful – I met all sorts of New Yorkers, learned about the political process, truly saw the importance of the individual in democracy. And even though my hours were nothing compared to the tireless staffers, they remembered my name and thanked me profusely at the humble yet energetic victory party, our new councilmember even taking time to offer advice on my current career path.

And it’s good to be a Democrat in 5-to-1 New York City. We’d won most of the new seats in the council and our incumbents blew away any competition, though the King of New York remained, and remained Republican.

Don’t get me wrong – by November 8, I was more than dismayed at the inept, unfocused campaign Fernando Ferrer had run. Ignoring entire demographics, narrowing his image unjustifiably, press mess-ups… but I still voted for him. Yes, out of party loyalty, but for many other reasons ranging from Bloomberg’s stratospheric Bush campaign contributions to residual bitterness at his ridiculous Olympics bid, instead of practical initiatives like real change in public education and housing affordable for those of us who can’t quite assume the suffix -illionaire.

“Hey – wanna go to the Bloomberg victory party?” The whisper came from Angela, one of the staff members and my new friend from the campaign. We both looked around, a little guilty. “It’s still going on and everything’s free.”

After all, our party had started to dissipate. And my fading energy and staunch Ferrer loyalty melted in light of the word that being a former starving artist had conditioned me to obey Pavlovianly: free. Plus, I reasoned, if I was going to endure four more years of Bloomberg, he could at least buy me a drink.

At the New York Sheraton, a purposeful loop of the crowded, St. John’s and Brooks Brothers-wearing, donor-soaked lobby yielded official Mike ’05 buttons and the names needed to gain entrance to the 45th floor, the site of the staffers-only fete.

One thing that was immediately apparent as we exited the mirrored elevator: no one looked like a staffer. The staffers I worked with were all wasted from too little sleep and too many action lists, with wrinkled clothes and grateful smiles barely masking their complete exhaustion. The Bloomberg staffers were in cocktail attire without exception – apparently their literature handouts were stationed in salons rather than subways.

Our entrance was blocked momentarily by the no-nonsense female bouncer, who insisted she knew nothing about our connections to get in. As I stepped aside to avoid getting shoved back, I noticed a few women waiting in head-to-toe hipster vintage, making me exhale a bit in my less-than-glam jeans and velvet blazer.

Just then, the reason for our wait emerged: Mike himself, with complete security detail, leaving the party, the only one who looked at all drained from the day’s events. I’d only seen him in person once before, on one of his famed subway rides. He was still well-dressed, well-protected, and well-fettered with an intimidating entourage. As he breezed past us to the elevator, barely acknowledging congratulations, we ducked into his penthouse party, which was still going strong.

After promptly visiting the top-shelf open bar (welcome after pacing out our drinks at the previous cash-bar victory party so many floors below), we gravitated toward the back bedroom where Angela’s friends had set up camp. They, after all, weren’t regular Bloombergians, they were part of a fellowship that assigns workers to various campaigns, and several of them had been placed on this one – our key to entry. All of them were Democrats.

Eager to investigate the foreign land I’d just gained passport to, I embarked on a purposeful mingling circle around the penthouse. The large rooms housed glamorous groups of groupies looking me up and down with condescending approval (men) or dismissal (women), and the small rooms revealed twos and threes that I half-expected to snort lines off the pristine gold-and-marble countertops. Okay, call me overdramatic, but my only experience partying with people whose bank accounts had never been in the red included access to all the stuff conservatives were always railing against.

Why didn’t anyone introduce himself? Why didn’t any other girls eat the copious amounts of chocolate cookies still out on every table? Why didn’t anyone stop to admire the amazing top-floor view of the Manhattan skyline, which still moves me after five years in the city? I guess I wasn’t used to being up so high.

Back in the bohemian oasis, tones were more relaxed, conversation less forced. That is, until a well-suited staffer dropped in on our circle of Levi’s and childlike delight that we were drinking bourbon instead of PBR. The conversation with these legitimates was always polite, congenial, but in the way that made me rub my cheeks in sympathy for the forced smiles, and rub my ears in angst of the screechy tones people assume when trying to sound interested, or worse yet, interesting.

That’s when I realized the girls in vintage hadn’t found their outfits rummaging through Williamsburg basement stores, like I had. It was the flavor du jour, a ruse, maybe; like my temporary re-alignment with the Republican Party.

“You were a Republican?” Angela gasped. “You have to explain that.”

“Well, I was, but not like this…” I began, then stopped short, not only by the crowd of Jenna and Paris clones that pushed past us, but by my realization that the Republicans I knew in real life, the ones who were puzzled by my party realignment, were not these people.

The Republicans that populate the red states, and more pivotally, the red half of the swing states, are not oil tycoons and CEOs bathing in stock options and corporate bonuses. The Republicans who vote Republican – my mother, my grandmother, my best friends from childhood – are hard-working, tax-paying believers in the old American dream, and don’t need big government to protect or even help them – yet. They trust that if the president says we need to go to war, well then, he must know, because after all, he’s the president. These are the values of their peers – or parents or grandparents- that fought the good fight against Nazi Germany and Communism – and won. I know because this is how I felt until I lived through September 11, when things started to seem more relative than black-and-white; when I found myself a resident of a city of immigrants, of every world culture, and of the widest gap between rich and poor, and it became all too clear that everyone in the land of dreams doesn’t wake up on the same pillow. The party I was presently party to has little in common with them other than US citizenship, yet they are the ruling class that the common people repeatedly vote into office.

The difference between the Bloomberg festivities and the councilmember’s was like going to a Hollywood movie premiere from an Off-Broadway play opening: glassy, evaluating, “Should I know who you are?” eyes versus rolled-up sleeves, “We’ve only just begun!” energy.

“Parties aren’t what you’re beholden to once you are in office,” a former city council speaker had said in a symposium I’d attended a month earlier. “You’re responsible to your constituents. Parties are the vehicle to get you into office.” Now I understand what he meant.

If there’s one thing Ferrer was right about in his push for mayor, it was his concept of Two New Yorks: the rich and poor, the white and non-white, the represented and ignored.

Only this was the first time I felt solidly in the second category.

Election Results


Guys, I am too upset to even write a coherent blog post.

Bloomberg re-elected after cheating. Every cheating incumbent City Councilmember getting another term. Republican governors in Virginia and New Jersey. I mean, for serious, WHO is voting for Republicans after all we've seen over the past few years???

I just... I can't... ARGH. It's nothing short of disgusting to me that more New Yorkers know -- and care -- about what's going on with the World Series than who's running our city and why. I give up.

Wednesday, October 28, 2009

Person of the Day: Judy Lobo

Thanks to Erica for bringing this blog to my attention. I'll be emailing the full text of this to all my NYC peeps.

‘I know, I know — but’ - is the response I have been getting from all of my friends when I tell them that I am not voting for Mayor Michael Bloomberg. Some friends look away with a momentary guilty look. Some hang their heads down and say ‘but I don’t like the other guy (Bill Thompson).’ Some just say ‘ well, he cannot be bought.’ To all of them, I say, as Rachel Maddow always says, ‘Bull Hockey.’

Here is why I am not voting for Mayor Mike.

Read Judy's seven dead-on reasons.

Tuesday, October 27, 2009

Cory, We Are So Over.


Oh. Hm. I have always been of fan of Cory Booker, Newark's mayor, not just because he is hot and as a single mayor provides one of the few opportunities for me to become an actual mayoress without running for office, but like so many men in the tri-state, I severely overestimated him.

On April 17, Mr. Booker, a Democrat, crossed party and state lines by endorsing Mr. Bloomberg, an independent running as a Republican, in Harlem. About a month later, Mr. Bloomberg’s longtime accountant contributed $26,000 — the maximum allowable — to Mr. Booker’s re-election committee next year, according to campaign finance records.

Full article.

LiveBlogging the Mayoral Debate

(refresh to see latest thoughts)

Watch it here.

Didn't tune in until 7:40 so I missed the bulk of it, but gotta say I'm quite impressed by Thompson, he's super prepared and holding his own; he's in it to win it.

I love how they're both pulling out their NY dialects even though Mike is from Boston.

Mike claims he's in touch with the average New Yorker because he once had a small business. Thompson rebuts by pointing out that his policies are pushing the middle class out of their neighborhoods. (Bloomberg's development incentives in my neighborhood are the very reason why I no longer have the lovely cityscape view I once had.)

Mike says immigrants will pull us out of the recession. WHAT?! Cheap labor is the answer? How about jobs for those of us who are already here?? Still waiting on that help for the economy Mike, or are you too loyal to your paying customers, aka the investment banks?

Thompson really is rocking it. I have to admit, I underestimated him. Probably because it's hard to drown out the $83 billion + in Bloomberg marketing cacophony.

"I think I'll be kind and give him a D-," Thompson on grading how the mayor has done.

Remember, I think it was the '05 election, when Bloomberg didn't even show up to the debates? Like he even has to. SIGH.

Friday, October 2, 2009

Today in Bloomberg Is a Greedy Bastard News

How do I love Bill Thompson, let me count the ways... His FB status reminds us all that today is the anniversary of Bloomie's power grab:

In 1993, New Yorkers voted in favor of a two-term limit for all elected officials. Three years later, New Yorkers then affirmed their referendum, limiting term limits to 8 years in office.

Today marks the one- year anniversary of the end of that law.

Full Article.

Wednesday, September 23, 2009

Get Your Own Box!

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The New York Times reports today that Bloomberg's favorite snack is...

Cheez-Its.

What! Everyone knows Cheez-Its are MY favorite snack. I once bought 10 boxes simply because they were on sale! I use them to carb up when running long distances! I use them to sober up after a night out! I can tell the difference between a perfect box and one that's slightly over-baked! I'm eating them right fucking now!!

Cheez-Its may be the most mayoral food, but they're property of The Mayoress, not the illegally-running-for-third-term mayor. This is personal now. All summer I was wondering: If I was a superhero, who would be my archnemesis? I guess we know now, Meet the Presslerians, I guess we know.

This is IT, Michael B. You are SO. GOING. DOWN.

Blog of the Day

Check this out! A whole blog devoted to explaining why Bloomberg is ridiculous! It's called No Power Grab, and has such gems as:

Here is a clip from an email I received from Dan Cantor, WFP Executive Director:
Thompson has a clear message. He believes that city government must always put the middle class and working families first - above the real estate developers and corporate interests that have dominated our city for too long. In a Thompson Administration, Wall Street won't be the only street that matters anymore. Flatbush Avenue, Queens Blvd., The Grand Concourse, Victory Boulevard, and 125th St will have a real voice in City Hall.

At last Thursday's Forum, in question after question, Thompson spoke boldly about his support for our values and issues. The Mayor mostly did not. (You can watch the highlights here.)

When asked about campaign spending, Mayor Bloomberg told the hundreds of WFP supporters watching in the room and online: "rich people don't always win."

Our job now is to prove him right.

Only prob is that it seems to be anonymous - hey No Power Grab blogger(s)! Email me so I can buy you a virtual drink or something!

Tuesday, September 22, 2009

Today in Bloomberg Is Stupid News

I'm all a'Twitter(ing)! Brian Lehrer is doing a segment on Bloomberg right now, including where his money goes. Turn on WNYC right now or listen online!

Michael Bloomberg claims that the upcoming election is a referendum on his record. So, what does the record tell us? The New Yorker’s Joyce Purnick has just published the sweeping biography Mike Bloomberg: Money, Power, Politics, which tells his story from childhood in Boston through his controversial bid for a third term. She examines the Bloomberg record and what’s at stake this fall.

I like this Joyce Purnick lady already. Some points being made:

Bloomie gets testy with journalists and refuses to answer when they ask about his third-term grab.

Fact that he was a former chain smoker and has a "constant struggle with weight" may have been the selfish reasons for the smoking ban and the calories on menus (both things I support, but seriously, NYC as B's personal playground? we should all be so lucky).

Is his "improvement of education" actually making kids smarter, or sacrificing learning to testing?

Heyyy, remember when the Republican convention was in NYC back in '04? You know, our city, that's 5-to-1 Democrat, where Bloomberg appeared as a Republican, when the NYPD cracked down big time on anyone protesting? Go America! The lawsuits that resulted cost the city a fortune. Bloomberg still contends protesters should have stayed home.

Whatever happened to the (totally elitist) plan for congestion pricing?

From the excellent comments section: "Since Bloomberg started pursuing politics his reported net worth has gone up 10 times. He has gone from a moderately wealthy man to the richest New Yorker while ignoring proscriptions from the City Conflict of Interest Board about how he should not be involved with his business and its client companies, nearly all of whom also do business with the city. Bloomberg has also, since he started pursuing politics in 1977, has been using his own charities and those run under the auspices of the city for political purposes which has skewed honest debate."

Two words: 2012 Olympics.


Wednesday, September 16, 2009

NYC Election Results and Call to Action

Here are your Democratic Nominees -

Mayor - Bill Thompson
Comptroller - Runoff election between John Liu and David Yassky (Yassky is my pick)
Public Advocate - Bill de Blasio
Manhattan DA - Cy Vance

And if you had a City Council race, you can pretty much assume your incumbent won. Mine did by only 2 percentage points.

But let's talk about the real problem. Excuse me while I climb onto my high horse.

So many of you did not vote yesterday. I know you're registered because you were oh so hyped up about Obama last fall. And you've had 10 months to switch your registration to your zip code of residency if you were previously registered in your home state.

Something like 300,000 voters turned out in a city of over 8.25 million. Sure, you can subtract those not eligible for this election like children and Independents, but come on: in November, over 2.3 million of you showed up.

I feel very strongly about this: there is no excuse for not voting. The NYC primaries is the place your vote counts the most. The only place your vote will count in November is the race for mayor because the Democrat always wins in the other offices. And the mayoral race is vital but because Bloomberg can outspend any opponent several times over, Bill Thompson is up against Goliath. And know what? Your ignorance and inaction is telling our politicians it's okay to do politics as usual.

I wanted to puke last night when I listened to Bloomberg say "I only take a salary of $1 a year, I work for YOU!" Um, hello? If we're not paying you, you're not working for us. You're volunteering. So this is all about your ego, and the billions that make you the richest man in NYC come from private interests. That's not the mayor I want. I'm not saying money always equals evil - if Bill Gates ran for office I'd be the first to vote for him - because he is a true progressive who spends his money helping people. Bloomberg spent his money contributing to Bush's 2004 campaign.

I will do everything I can to get as many votes for Thompson between now and November 3. I hope you find your city, the amount of taxes you pay and where they go, how tourism is handled, services for the poor, law enforcement, the environment, MTA fare hikes, real estate development, the arts, and all the other things the local governement decides, worth it.

Wednesday, September 9, 2009

Mayoress Endorsements: NYC Primary 9/15


Okay, New York City Democrats. You're voting on Tuesday 9/15, and at the risk of repeating myself for the umpteenth time:

Why is the primary MORE important that the general election, class?

BECAUSE, my dear readers, in New York, the Democrat almost always gets elected, so choosing WHICH Democrat is MORE important, and that happens on Tuesday, September 15. This is also why you must register as a Democrat, not an Independent.

>Visit the Official NYC Voter Guide

MAYOR: WILLIAM C. THOMPSON
From the start, Thompson has been speaking out against Bloomberg's continued ridiculousness. He recognizes that NYC is more than just the affluent neighborhoods and believes in creating jobs and backing social services. Our current Comptroller (and therefore well acquainted with our city's fiscal position), he's also really good at using Facebook appropriately as an elected official, which sets my marketer's heart a-twitter (hee!).

PUBLIC ADVOCATE: ERIC GIOIA
I'll be honest, this is my toughest category, so I opted for advice from the politically active people I admire most (props, Babs Chen and Matt Silverstein). There are several strong choices here so go ahead and check them all out. And don't fault Gioia if he's suddenly scarce over the next few days - his wife's nine months pregs.

COMPTROLLER: DAVID YASSKY
I'm a Yassky fan going back 4 years. When I was going through my career change and considering politics, city council worker and friend Emily Merrill cited Yassky as one of the few who was progressively representing his district, which includes my neighbors just a few blocks west in the 'burg. I worked on his campaign for Congress, which he lost, but I'm glad he's now running to keep serving the city. He's a champion of green energy and seems pretty genuine for a local politician, so he's my pick.

CITY COUNCIL
I urge you to find out who your incumbent is and NOT vote for him or her. Why? Because he or she helped Bloomberg overturn the law that NYC voters established overturning term limits. None of them deserve to be re-elected after committing such a heinous crime against their constituents. This is also why Bloomberg must be voted on on November 3.

MANHATTAN D.A.
I'm in Brooklyn but for all my city peeps, a word of caution before you vote for Cy Vance Jr. because the Times told you to: his primary legal experience is defending white collar criminals. Is that really the influence we want at city hall? So, as always, everyone vote for Sam Waterston 4evah! YAY!! (But seriously, here's some good info on the candidates.)

Okay, players - go VOTE!